TI-313Life1950s

A salmon finds its river by the smell

Young salmon imprint on the chemistry of their home stream. Years later, coming back from the ocean, they choose that stream by its odour. Block the nose and the choice fails.

Established2 min read

Arthur Hasler proposed that the stream writes itself into the young fish, and then tested it. Salmon with their olfactory nerves blocked could not repeat the homing that intact fish managed. Exposing young fish to an artificial odour, and scenting a stream with it years later, drew them to water they had never lived in. The memory is specific enough to separate one tributary from the next, which is why a fish born in a particular creek turns into that creek and not the one a kilometre on. The odorants are the ordinary chemistry of rock, soil and plants. The fish stores a signature it will not need until it has crossed an ocean.

Smell is the last mile, not the whole voyage. In the open ocean, magnetic cues and others contribute to getting the fish back to the right coast. The experiments that made the case are about the river choice, where odour dominates and where damaging the nose is decisive. Not every salmon makes it, and hatchery practice can blur the signature by rearing fish in featureless water. The wild fact remains uncomfortable in the best way: a memory of a smell, taken in youth, is a set of directions good enough to find one door on a coastline.

Caveats

  • Olfaction governs the choice among tributaries. It is not, by itself, the explanation of the entire ocean crossing. Magnetic and other cues are part of that earlier leg.
  • The classic conditioning results are from salmonids, in experiments. Streams really do differ in chemistry. The fish is not following a trail of its own ancestors' scent in any simple story. It learned the water.

Sources

  1. 1Hasler A. D., Scholz A. T.. Olfactory Imprinting and Homing in Salmon. Springer, 1983.

Related